Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Colin Summers's avatar

My current take is I don't think anybody knows what the movements in any historic kata are for other than they convay principles applicable to combat. Applications are invented based primarily on how and what kata is performed by the practitioner and the combative techniques they know. For me the brilliance of kata is that you learn movements which are applicable to innumerable applications. Hense when you work with partners to learn a new combative technique the Kata training has provided the principles of movement to make it work. I've come to think that trying to understand the movements in kata as a specific sequence of combative techniques risks constraining the kata movement to a single application in the mind. Partner work exploring combative techniques is essential for discoving how kata is applied. Learning kata as a ridge reinactment of combative techniques for me seems to be missing the point. This article gives me some confidence my thinking may not be totally off the mark.

Alain Mokbel's avatar

If I may, theoretically speaking, the techniques in kata should be short and decisive, right?

Flow drills are usually longer.

So doing a flow drill for kata might simply be difficult to match in terms of rhythm.

Hanshi Patrick McCarthy has several flow drills that are worth looking into. Check out videos from Koryu Uchinadi if you haven’t already.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?